<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cheng-tsui.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>stories</title>
 <link>http://www.cheng-tsui.com/category/tags/stories</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Tales and Traditions Volume One</title>
 <link>http://www.cheng-tsui.com/forum/product_feedback_teaching_ideas/other_products/tales_traditions_volume_one</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Several months ago, I purchased the book Tales and Traditions, Volume One. It contains twenty-some stories about Chinese proverbs, historical figures, and myths. The book is suggested to be appropriate for Advanced Beginners of Chinese. I was thrilled to finally find this kind of book. After testing a couple stories with my students, I had them purchase it and we are using it as supplementary materials for this semester. Thank you to those responsible for putting together this series of readers, I look forward to seeing more of the beginning level variety in the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, I do have some questions/comments. How was the vocabulary and grammar in these readers graded, that is, how was it decided if the vocabulary/grammar was truly &#039;advanced beginner&#039; level vocabulary? I ask because I find that several words appearing in the stories that seem relatively &#039;advanced&#039;, on the other hand I find words in the vocabulary lists that strike me as being things even advanced beginners should know. I recognize that there is bound to be some disagreement on how to grade vocabulary/grammar, particularly with the task of distinguishing between common vocabulary vs. common characters. I imagine that no matter how much care goes into the process, some words that are less common will likely sneak into the stories without comment. Could I suggest that for future volumes, a bit more information could be provided about the process? It would be especially useful if the books would indicate what vocabulary items are NOT part of a core of 1000 or so characters/words, and where that standard core came from. If for some reason it seems unnecessary/cumbersome to include that information in the book, could it be made available on-line?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks again for making readable materials with real cultural value available for our beginning Chinese students. Keep up the good work!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.cheng-tsui.com/forum/product_feedback_teaching_ideas/other_products/tales_traditions_volume_one#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.cheng-tsui.com/crss/node/2711</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.cheng-tsui.com/category/forum/product_feedback_teaching_ideas/other_products">Other Products</category>
 <category domain="http://www.cheng-tsui.com/taxonomy/term/75">Chinese</category>
 <category domain="http://www.cheng-tsui.com/category/tags/graded_readers">graded readers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.cheng-tsui.com/category/tags/stories">stories</category>
 <category domain="http://www.cheng-tsui.com/category/tags/textbooks">textbooks</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2711 at http://www.cheng-tsui.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
