Register | Cart View Cart | Sign in
Logo
Search
  • Company
  • Service & Support
  • Resource Center
  • Download Center
  • Store

New Topics

  • Maximizing Integrated Chinese in Your Classroom
  • Fun and useful ways to learn Chinese measure words
  • Sign up to field test AP Japanese materials!
  • Not acceptable publication.
  • Karaoke Contest!
more »

New Comments

  • I totally agree - definitely
  • Many improvements in 2nd and 3rd editions
  • Sorted list of characters
  • Character and word count for Level 1 - Part 1 of Second Edition
  • Yes, audio will be updated
more »
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Feedback and Learning Resources
  • Language Teaching and Learning

Character Workbooks - Simp & Trad together or separate?

  • Language Teaching and Learning
  • character workbook
  • characters
  • polls
  • writing
Submitted by Laurel on Fri, 11/30/2007 - 2:05pm.
If you're a student or teacher of Chinese, we want to hear your opinion on whether you prefer to have simplified and traditional characters together in the same practice book so that you can compare both forms, or separated into different books so that you can focus on just one. Please take our poll and let us know what you think!
‹ Fun and useful ways to learn Chinese measure words Are simplified characters or traditional characters better? ›
  • Add new comment

traditional of simplified

Submitted by Visitor on Thu, 01/17/2008 - 2:45pm.

My answer would be that it depends on whether the book is meant as study materials or reference materials. Reference materials, even for beginners, definitely should have both forms. For study materials, I would prefer that only one form was highlighted. For example, in a reading book for beginners, I would want simplified or only traditional. In a writing book for beginners, I would want one form as focus, the other form provided simply for reference.

Once students are beyond the intermediate level, I would expect that they should be getting used to reading (not writing) both forms of characters, so alternating both forms in one book might be valuable (i.e. lesson 1 is in simplified, lesson 2 in traditional), with vocabulary and index containing both forms. This not something I have seen at this point. Such a design would possibly narrow the marketability of the book, but it would force students to work on reading both forms, rather than just reading the one they are used to. For advanced students, I think being able to read both forms is a reality that they will have to contend with eventually.

  • reply

About Us | News | Customer Service | Forums | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Cheng & Tsui Company, Inc. All rights reserved. Secured by Comodo®. Powered by Drupal.